From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Stanley

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division
Dec 18, 2024
CRIMINAL 4:04-CR-88-SDJ (E.D. Tex. Dec. 18, 2024)

Opinion

CRIMINAL 4:04-CR-88-SDJ

12-18-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AMER STANLEY


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SEAN D. JORDAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Defendant Amer Stanley's Pro Se Motion Requesting the ‘Status' of His Appointed Counsel in Reference to His Motion for a Compassionate Release Pursuant U.S.S.G. Amendment #814 and 18 U.S.C. & 3582(c)(1)(A). (Dkt. #115). In that motion, Amer Stanley requests that the Court “order the federal Public Defender's Office to enter its appearance on the record immediately due to this Court's order as to the FRP appointment on January 26, 2024.” (Dkt. #115 at 2). But that appointment was related to Defendant's motion to reduce sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), (Dkt. #114), not for a compassionate-release motion under Section 3582(c)(1). Indeed, Defendant has no pending motion for compassionate release.

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant's Pro Se Motion Requesting the ‘Status' of His Appointed Counsel in Reference to His Motion for a Compassionate Release Pursuant U.S.S.G. Amendment #814 and 18 U.S.C. & 3582(c)(1)(A), (Dkt. #115), is DENIED as moot.

So ORDERED


Summaries of

United States v. Stanley

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division
Dec 18, 2024
CRIMINAL 4:04-CR-88-SDJ (E.D. Tex. Dec. 18, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Stanley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AMER STANLEY

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division

Date published: Dec 18, 2024

Citations

CRIMINAL 4:04-CR-88-SDJ (E.D. Tex. Dec. 18, 2024)