From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Standridge

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 13, 2024
4:17-CR-00293-BSM-09 (E.D. Ark. Mar. 13, 2024)

Opinion

4:17-CR-00293-BSM-09

03-13-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. LESA STANDRIDGE DEFENDANT


ORDER

Lesa Standridge's pro se motion to reduce sentence [Doc. No. 2849] is denied because Standridge was sentenced to 120 months, which is below her new range of 121 to 151 months. Therefore she is not eligible for a further reduction. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(b)(2). Additionally, Standridge's plea agreement “waive[d] the right to have the sentence modified pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3582(c)(2) ....” Doc. No. 2203 at 3. Because Standridge knowingly and voluntarily entered into her plea agreement, she is not entitled to relief. United States v. Cowan, 781 Fed.Appx. 571 (8th Cir. 2019) (affirming dismissal of a § 3582(c)(2) motion when the record established that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered the plea agreement).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Standridge

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 13, 2024
4:17-CR-00293-BSM-09 (E.D. Ark. Mar. 13, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Standridge

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. LESA STANDRIDGE DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Mar 13, 2024

Citations

4:17-CR-00293-BSM-09 (E.D. Ark. Mar. 13, 2024)