From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Stamey

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 1, 1970
423 F.2d 1223 (4th Cir. 1970)

Opinion

No. 13801.

Decided April 1, 1970.

Alton T. Cummings, Asheville, N.C. (court-appointed counsel) for appellant.

Keith S. Snyder, U.S. Atty. for the Western District of N.C., and James O. Israel, Asst. U.S. Atty., for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and CRAVEN, and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.


Clyde Wallace Stamey appeals from a conviction for bank robbery [ 18 U.S.C. § 2113], assigning as error the admission of police officers' testimony quoting a prior consistent statement made by a government witness.

The testimony was properly admitted. The declarant was subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the testimony of his prior consistent statement was offered to rebut charges of recent fabrication or improper motive. See generally Proposed Rules of Evidence for the United States District Courts and Magistrates, 8-01(c)(2) (ii), and Advisory Committee's Note (c) (2) (ii), pp. 159 and 165 (Preliminary Draft, 1969).

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Stamey

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 1, 1970
423 F.2d 1223 (4th Cir. 1970)
Case details for

United States v. Stamey

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Clyde Wallace STAMEY, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Apr 1, 1970

Citations

423 F.2d 1223 (4th Cir. 1970)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Bolick

It has long been established that prior consistent statements in corroboration of the testimony of the…

United States v. Gandy

Gandy argues that because the prior consistent statements were made after this date, they were inadmissible.…