From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. St. John

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Apr 15, 2013
Case No. 8:11-mc-00099-JDW-MAP (M.D. Fla. Apr. 15, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 8:11-mc-00099-JDW-MAP

04-15-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. PAUL R. ST. JOHN, Respondent.


ORDER

BEFORE THE COURT is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 34). As of this date, there are no objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for the parties to file such objections has elapsed. See M.D. Fla. L.R. 6.02.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994).

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings, conclusions and recommendations, and giving de novo review to matters of law, the Court accepts the factual findings and legal conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and adopts his recommendation. Accordingly,

1) The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 34) is APPROVED and ADOPTED for all purposes, including for appellate review.

2) Respondent Paul R. St. John is found to be in CIVIL CONTEMPT for refusing to comply with the Court order enforcing the Internal Revenue Service Summonses served on Respondent on April 21, 2011 (Dkt. 11).

3) Respondent Paul R. St. John is ordered to SHOW CAUSE as to why he should not be incarcerated as an appropriate sanction for his civil contempt, In re Lawrence, 279 F.3d 1294, 1300 (11th Cir. 2002), by appearing in person on April 30, 2013 at 2:00 P.M., at the federal courthouse, Courtroom 13B, in Tampa, Florida. Failure to appear will result in the issuance of a warrant for Respondent's arrest.

______________

JAMES D. WHITTEMORE

United States District Judge
Copies to: Counsel of Record


Summaries of

United States v. St. John

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Apr 15, 2013
Case No. 8:11-mc-00099-JDW-MAP (M.D. Fla. Apr. 15, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. St. John

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. PAUL R. ST. JOHN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Date published: Apr 15, 2013

Citations

Case No. 8:11-mc-00099-JDW-MAP (M.D. Fla. Apr. 15, 2013)

Citing Cases

United States v. Lonnen

Furthermore, there is no contextual proof to show that the information sought is incriminating. Mr. Lonnen…