From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Sperow

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2018
Case No. 2:18-cv-01186 VAP (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 2:18-cv-01186 VAP (JEMx)

10-18-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. GREGORY FRANK SPEROW, Defendant/Petitioner.


JUDGMENT

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Pursuant to the Order Granting the Government's Motion to Dismiss Gregory Frank Sperow's Rule 41(g) Petition, IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Sperow's claims against Respondent are DISMISSED without leave to amend. The Court orders that such judgment be entered.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10/18/18

/s/_________

Virginia A. Phillips

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Sperow

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2018
Case No. 2:18-cv-01186 VAP (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Sperow

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. GREGORY FRANK SPEROW…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 18, 2018

Citations

Case No. 2:18-cv-01186 VAP (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2018)

Citing Cases

Khudainatov v. United States

Seeing as Respondent's Opposition asserts that this case should be dismissed because: (1) the pending Civil…

In re 2015 Chevrolet Silverado

Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g). Where, as here, there are no criminal proceedings pending against the movant, the…