From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Soyinthisane

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 27, 2011
CASE NO. 1:11-cr-00235 LJO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-cr-00235 LJO

10-27-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SOMSACK THOULY SOYINTHISANE, ET AL., Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LAUREL J. MONTOYA Assistant U.S. Attorney DANIEL HARRALSON Attorney for Defendant Somsack Thouly Soyinthisane ROBERT WILKINSON Attorney for Defendant George Rivera CAROL ANN MOSES Attorney for Defendant Jose Antonio Guzman BARBARA HOPE O'NEILL Attorney for Defendant Juan Manuel Torres-Zaragoza


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

LAUREL J. MONTOYA

Assistant U.S. Attorney

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND ORDER

DATE: November 14, 2012

TIME: 1:00 P.M.

PLACE: Courtroom Four

Honorable

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel, that the current status conference set for October 28, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., be continued to November 14, 2011, at 1:00 p.m. before the Honorable , United States District Court Judge.

The parties further stipulate and agree that the time between October 28, 2011, and November 14, 2011 be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for the defendant may have time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). Specifically, additional reports that the government expected to have by this time have been requested but not received. Additionally, there has been difficulty converting some of the electronic discovery to a format that can be opened and copied for the defense. The government is working to resolve this. The lab reports significantly impact on the determination of the guidelines in this matter and although requested, the report has not been received. The parties need time to review the discovery so the offers can be evaluated. The parties will be prepared to enter a plea, set a change of plea hearing, or set a trial date at the next hearing.

The parties stipulate and agree that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A).

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

LAUREL J. MONTOYA

Assistant U.S. Attorney

DANIEL HARRALSON

Attorney for Defendant

Somsack Thouly Soyinthisane

ROBERT WILKINSON

Attorney for Defendant

George Rivera

CAROL ANN MOSES

Attorney for Defendant

Jose Antonio Guzman

BARBARA HOPE O'NEILL

Attorney for Defendant

Juan Manuel Torres-Zaragoza

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Status Conference hearing of October 24, 2011 (the time between Oct 24 and 28 is excluded administratively for good cause, due to the reassignment of the case from retired Senior District Judge Wanger to the undersigned)at 9:00 a.m. be continued to November 14, 2011 at 1:00 p.m. Time shall be excluded to and through that date. For the reasons set forth above, the continuance requested is granted for good cause and the Court finds the ends of justice outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

At the next hearing on November 14, the case will be either pled or set for trial. That hearing will be the 4th status hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Soyinthisane

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 27, 2011
CASE NO. 1:11-cr-00235 LJO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Soyinthisane

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SOMSACK THOULY SOYINTHISANE, ET…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 27, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-cr-00235 LJO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2011)