From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Soto

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 6, 2023
2:20-cr-00003-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Apr. 6, 2023)

Opinion

2:20-cr-00003-APG-EJY

04-06-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JORGE SOTO, Defendant,

MELANEE SMITH, ESQ. Attorney for the United States of America CHRISTOPHER R. ORAM, ESQ. Attorney for Jorge Soto


MELANEE SMITH, ESQ.

Attorney for the United States of America

CHRISTOPHER R. ORAM, ESQ.

Attorney for Jorge Soto

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE EVIDENTIARY HEARING, CALENDAR CALL, AND JURY TRIAL

ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by JORGE SOTO, by and through his attorney, CHRISTOPHER R. ORAM, ESQ., and the United States of America, by and through MS. MELANEE SMITH, Assistant United States Attorney, that the Evidentiary Hearing in the above-captioned matter, currently scheduled for April 13th, 2023, at 9:30 AM, the Calendar Call in the above-captioned matter, currently scheduled for May 2nd, 2023, at 9:00 AM, and the Jury Trial in the above-captioned matter, currently scheduled for May 8th, 2023, at 9:00 AM be vacated and continued to a date and time convenient to the Court, but not earlier than one hundred-twenty (120) days.

This request for a continuance is based upon the following:

1. Mr. Soto has not yet been evaluated by the Government's Psychological Expert Witness, nor is a report from the Government's expert expected in time, due to Mr. Soto currently being incarcerated in Arizona.
2. Additionally, Mr. Soto is currently in custody in Arizona, pending charges unrelated to this matter, and cannot be present at the Evidentiary Hearing, Calendar Call, and Jury Trial.
3. Both parties agree to withdraw the Motion to Suppress Evidence without prejudice and will refile the above-mentioned motion when the Defendant is transported back to Nevada.
4. The Government has no objection to the continuance.
5. Mr. Soto does not object to the continuance.
6. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay.
7. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.
8. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time for which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act,18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(7)(A), considering the factors under 18 U.S.C. Sections 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv).

WHEREFORE, for all the foregoing reasons, the parties request that the Court enter their Stipulation as an Order of the Court.

ORDER

Based upon the pending Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. The parties have stipulated to continue the Evidentiary Hearing, Calendar Call, and Jury Trial, as presently scheduled.

2. This Court, being convinced that adequate showing has been made that were this request for continuance to be denied, the ends of justice would not be served, based on the following:

a. Currently, this matter is set for an Evidentiary Hearing, Calendar Call, and Jury Trial before this Court on April 13th, 2023, May 2nd, 2023, and May 8th, 2023, respectively.
b. Mr. Soto has not yet been evaluated by the Government's Psychological Expert Witness, nor is a report from the Government's expert expected in time, due to Mr. Soto currently being incarcerated in Arizona.
c. Additionally, Mr. Soto is currently in custody in Arizona, pending charges
unrelated to this matter, and cannot be present at the Evidentiary Hearing, Calendar Call, and Jury Trial.
d. Both parties agree to withdraw the Motion to Suppress Evidence without prejudice and will refile the above-mentioned motion when the Defendant is transported back to Nevada.
e. The Government has no objection to the continuance.
f. Mr. Soto does not object to the continuance.
g. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay.
h. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.
i. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time for which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(7)(A), considering the factors under 18 U.S.C. Sections 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv).
j. For all of the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the Evidentiary Hearing, Calendar Call, and Jury Trial, but for a period of not less than one hundred-twenty (120) days from the current dates for Evidentiary Hearing, Calendar Call, and Jury Trial.

ORDER

The stipulation to continue the May 2023 Trial dates is granted.

Master Trial Scheduling Conference is continued to August 22, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. by video conference. Calendar Call is continued to September 5, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6C. Jury Trial is continued to September 11, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6C.

IT IS SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

United States v. Soto

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 6, 2023
2:20-cr-00003-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Apr. 6, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Soto

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JORGE SOTO, Defendant,

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 6, 2023

Citations

2:20-cr-00003-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Apr. 6, 2023)