From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Solorio-Mendoza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 26, 2011
No. 1:11-CR-216 LJO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)

Opinion

No. 1:11-CR-216 LJO

10-26-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUAN SOLORIO-MENDOZA, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney HENRY CARBAJAL Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender RACHEL W. HILL Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant Juan Solorio-Mendoza


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

RACHEL W. HILL, Bar #151522

Assistant Federal Defender

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for Defendant

JUAN SOLORIO-MENDOZA

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS

CONFERENCE HEARING; ORDER

Date : December 5, 2011

Time: 1:00 P.M.

Judge: Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that the status conference in the above-entitled matter scheduled for October 28, 2011, may be continued to December 5, 2011, at 1:00 P.M.

This continuance is made at the request of defense counsel. The defense is seeking additional discovery from the government. The government will seek to see if the requested discovery exists. The government has provided the defense with a plea offer, but counsel is unable to determine the relative merits of the offer until she receives the requested discovery, which she believes does exist. AUSA Henry Carbajal has no objection to this request. The requested continuance will conserve time and resources for both counsel and the court.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded because the ends of justice served by continuing this case outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial in that additional time is necessary for effective defense preparation. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

HENRY CARBAJAL

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

RACHEL W. HILL

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

Juan Solorio-Mendoza

ORDER

Good Cause exists. Time is excluded for the reasons stated. At the next hearing, either a change of please will occur or counsel should be ready to set the trial.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Solorio-Mendoza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 26, 2011
No. 1:11-CR-216 LJO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Solorio-Mendoza

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUAN SOLORIO-MENDOZA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 26, 2011

Citations

No. 1:11-CR-216 LJO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)