From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Snyder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 17, 2011
Case No. 11-337 LKK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 11-337 LKK

08-17-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MELINDA SUE SNYDER, Defendant.

DANIEL BRODERICK Federal Defender MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr. Assistant Federal Defender BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney MICHELE BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, #89424

Federal Defender

MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr., #177913

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorneys for Defendant

MELINDA SUE SNYDER

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE

STATUS CONFERENCE TO SEPTEMBER

20, 2011, AT 9:15 A.M.

Date: August 23, 2011

Time: 9:15 a.m.

Judge: Lawrence K. Karlton

THE PARTIES STIPULATE, through their respective attorneys, that the Court should vacate the status conference scheduled for August 23, 2011, at 9:15 a.m., and reset it on September 20, 2011, at 9:15 a.m.

Counsel for defendant requires further time to review discovery and to confer with the defendant.

The parties further stipulate that the Court should exclude the period from the date of this order through September 20, 2011, when it computes the time within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, and that this is an appropriate exclusion of time for defense preparation within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) (Local Code T4).

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL BRODERICK

Federal Defender

MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr.

Assistant Federal Defender

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

MICHELE BECKWITH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court orders time excluded from the date of this order through the status conference on September 20, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) (Local Code T4). The Court also finds that the ends of justice served by granting defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Snyder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 17, 2011
Case No. 11-337 LKK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Snyder

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MELINDA SUE SNYDER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 17, 2011

Citations

Case No. 11-337 LKK (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2011)