Opinion
3:24-CR-48-CCB-SJF
12-13-2024
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RAYMOND CALVIN SMITH
AMENDED ORDER
CRISTAL C. BRISCO, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
The Court has reviewed the findings and recommendations of Magistrate Judge Scott J. Frankel as stated on the record during the plea hearing held on September 4, 2024. [DE 17]. Raymond Smith pleaded guilty to Count 1 of the Information which charges him with mail fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1341. Raymond Smith also pleaded guilty to Count 2 of the Information which charges him with tax evasion, in violation of Title 26, United States Code, Section 7201. No party objected, and the time to object has passed. The Court now adopts the findings and recommendations in their entirety. The plea of guilty to these offenses as charged in the Information is hereby accepted, and the defendant is adjudged guilty of the offenses.
Any objections a party submits to the probation officer in response to the draft Presentence Report must specifically identify the basis of the objection and any supporting authority. Should the Addendum to the final Presentence Report reflect any outstanding objections by a party, that party must specifically state in its sentencing memorandum whether it maintains that objection. If so, the party must identify the basis and authority for its objection and, where applicable, any evidence the party expects to offer in support of that objection. The party should also state if, consistent with Rule 32(i)(3)(B), it does not believe a ruling on that objection will be necessary.
SO ORDERED.