From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Smith

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 24, 2023
3:22-cr-00051-RTB-CSD (D. Nev. Oct. 24, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cr-00051-RTB-CSD

10-24-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LATONIA SMITH, Defendant.

CUAUHTEMOC ORTEGA FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER JASON M. FRIERSON UNITED STATES ATTORNEY MEGAN RACHOW ANDOLYN JOHNSON Assistant United States Attorneys CHARLES EATON ANGEAC.C. VIRAMONTES DEPUTY FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS LATONIA SMITH DEFENDANT


CUAUHTEMOC ORTEGA FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

JASON M. FRIERSON UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

MEGAN RACHOW ANDOLYN JOHNSON Assistant United States Attorneys

CHARLES EATON

ANGEAC.C. VIRAMONTES

DEPUTY FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS

LATONIA SMITH

DEFENDANT

ORDER APPROVING

STIPULATION RE: REPORT ASSESSING LATIONIA SMITH'S COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL

HON. ROGER T. BENITEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendant Latonia Smith (“Ms' Smith”), by and through her attorney of record, Deputy Federal Public Defenders, Angela C. C. Viramontes and Charles Eaton, and I Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its attorney of record Assistant United I States Attorney Megan Rachow (together, the “Stipulating Parties”), hereby stipulate to the I findings of the Forensic Evaluation of October 16, 2023 (“October Evaluation,” Dkt. No. I 119). Counsel for Ms. Smith discussed this matter with her on October 19,2023. Counsel for Ms. Smith discussed this matter with the Government on October 19, 2023. I

1. On October 16,2023, the October Evaluation was written by Clinical Psychologist C. Young Psy.D., and reviewed by Chief Psychologist C. Feliciano, Psy.D. (together,: “Evaluating Psychologists”). (Id. at 10.)

2. In the October Evaluation, the Evaluating Psychologists noted that while Ms. Smith currently “meets the criteria for a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, [multiple episodes, in full remission, it does not appear that the signs or symptoms would impair her present ability to understand the nature and consequences of the court I proceedings against her or to assist in her defense adequately.” (Id. at 9.)

3. Additionally, the Evaluating Psychologists found that Ms. Smith “has the ability to understand the nature and consequences of the court proceedings against her and to assist counsel in her defense appropriately.” (Id. at 9-10.)

4. Based on these findings, Warden M. D. Smith of the Federal Medical Center [ (FMC), Carswell stated that “Ms. Smith has the ability to understand the nature and consequences of the court proceedings against her and to assist counsel in her defense appropriately.” (See Pkt. No. 119-1.)

5. The Stipulating Parties have agreed to stipulate to the findings and conclusions of 11 the October Evaluation.

Accordingly, based on the stipulating of the parties, the findings of the October Evaluation (Dkt. No. 119), and the Court's own observations, Latonia Smith requests the Court find that she is competent to stand trial in this matter.

The Court, having reviewed the October Evaluation, Warden M. D. Smith s certificate of competency and the Stipulation of the parties, hereby finds by a preponderance of the evidence that Ms. Smith has been restored to competency and is competent to stand trial

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Smith

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 24, 2023
3:22-cr-00051-RTB-CSD (D. Nev. Oct. 24, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LATONIA SMITH, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 24, 2023

Citations

3:22-cr-00051-RTB-CSD (D. Nev. Oct. 24, 2023)