Opinion
20-7656
09-14-2021
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DALTON LAQUANE SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
Dalton Laquane Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: August 25, 2021
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Senior District Judge. (3:13-cr-01038-JFA-1)
Dalton Laquane Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Dalton Laquane Smith appeals the district court's order denying his postjudgment motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Our review of the record confirms that the district court properly denied Smith's motion. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(e). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order.
Consistent with our decision in United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003), we construe Smith's notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Upon review, we conclude that Smith's claims do not meet the relevant standard. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). We therefore deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.