From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Smith

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 25, 2019
No. 18-7333 (4th Cir. Jan. 25, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-7333

01-25-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TIMOTHY SMITH, a/k/a Little Boo, Defendant - Appellant.

Timothy Smith, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:12-cr-00220-D-2) Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Timothy Smith appeals the district court's order denying Smith's 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion based on the serious risk a reduction in Smith's sentence would pose to public safety. See United States v. Smalls, 720 F.3d 193, 195 (4th Cir. 2013) ("Whether to reduce a sentence and to what extent is a matter within the district court's discretion."). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Smith, No. 5:12-cr-00220-D-2 (E.D.N.C. May 19, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Smith

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 25, 2019
No. 18-7333 (4th Cir. Jan. 25, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TIMOTHY SMITH, a/k/a…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 25, 2019

Citations

No. 18-7333 (4th Cir. Jan. 25, 2019)