From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Apr 22, 2016
Case No. 12-cr-20095 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 22, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 12-cr-20095

04-22-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. KELLI RAE SMITH, Defendant/Petitioner.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS, DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE, DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY, AND DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL

On October 27, 2016, Defendant/Petitioner Kelli Rae Smith filed a pro se motion to vacate her sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See Def.'s Mot. Vacate, ECF No. 43. She made different claims that her counsel was ineffective. First, counsel was ineffective because he committed errors that "caused [her] sentence to be greater than it would have been." Id. at 5. Second, her counsel was ineffective for failing to question witnesses. Third, her counsel was ineffective for not advising her of her rights at sentencing. And fourth, her counsel was ineffective for not objecting to her enhancement for obstruction of justice and her loss of her acceptance of responsibility points at sentencing.

On March 10, 2016, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris issued a report recommending that Defendant's motion be denied because, in her plea agreement, she waived her right to collaterally attack her sentence and does not claim that her plea was unknowing or involuntary. See Rep. & Rec. 5-7, ECF No. 60.

Although the Magistrate Judge's report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, ECF No. 60, is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that the Government's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 49, is GRANTED.

It is further ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Vacate, ECF No. 43, is DENIED.

It is further ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

It is further ORDERED that permission to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED.

s/Thomas L. Ludington

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge Dated: April 22, 2016

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on April 22, 2016.

s/Amanda Chubb for Michael A. Sian

MICHAEL A. SIAN


Summaries of

United States v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Apr 22, 2016
Case No. 12-cr-20095 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 22, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. KELLI RAE SMITH…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 22, 2016

Citations

Case No. 12-cr-20095 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 22, 2016)