From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 1, 2011
No. CR. S-10-191 JAM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)

Opinion

No. CR. S-10-191 JAM

09-01-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TODD ALLEN SMITH, et al., Defendants.

BRUCE LOCKE Attorney for Todd Smith For PATRICK HANLEY Attorney for Darrin Johnston For DOUGLAS BEEVERS Attorney for Cheryl Peterson For TODD PICKLES Attorney for the United States


BRUCE LOCKE (#177787)

Moss & Locke

Attorneys for

TODD ALLEN SMITH

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS

CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDE TIME

UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the defendants, Damn Johnston, Todd Smith, and Cheryl Peterson, by and through their undersigned defense counsel, and the United States of America by and through its counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Todd Pickles, that the status conference presently set for September 6, 2011 at 9:30 a.m., should be continued to October 4, 2011 at 9:30 a.m., and that time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from September 6, 2011 through October 4, 2011.

The reason for the continuance is that the defendants are continuing their investigation and preparation of the matter for trial. There is substantial discovery and the issues are complicated. Accordingly, the time between September 6, 2011 and October 4, 2011 should be excluded from the Speedy Trial calculation pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4 for defense preparation. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A). Mr. Pickles and the undersigned defense counsel have authorized Mr. Locke to sign this pleading for them.

BRUCE LOCKE

Attorney for Todd Smith

For PATRICK HANLEY

Attorney for Darrin Johnston

For DOUGLAS BEEVERS

Attorney for Cheryl Peterson

For TODD PICKLES

Attorney for the United States

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

John A. Mendez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 1, 2011
No. CR. S-10-191 JAM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TODD ALLEN SMITH, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 1, 2011

Citations

No. CR. S-10-191 JAM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2011)