From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Slayton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
Oct 26, 2020
Crim. Action No.: 2:20cr23-2 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 26, 2020)

Opinion

Crim. Action No.: 2:20cr23-2

10-26-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MELISSA ANN SLAYTON, Defendant.


( ) ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY IN FELONY CASE [DKT. NO. 47] , ACCEPTING GUILTY PLEA , AND SCHEDULING SENTENCING HEARING

On October 9, 2020, the Defendant, Melissa Ann Slayton ("Slayton"), appeared before United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Aloi and moved for permission to enter a plea of GUILTY to Count Two of the Indictment, charging her with Possession with Intent to Distribute at Least Five Grams of Methamphetamine, in violation of Title 21, U.S.C. 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B)(viii). Slayton stated that she understood that the magistrate judge is not a United States District Judge, and Slayton consented to pleading before the magistrate judge. This Court referred Defendant's plea of guilty to the magistrate judge for the purpose of administering the allocution, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, making a finding as to whether the plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered, and recommending to this Court whether the plea should be accepted.

Based upon Defendant Slayton's statements during the plea hearing and the Government's proffer establishing that an independent factual basis for the plea existed, the magistrate judge found that Defendant Slayton was competent to enter a plea, that the plea was freely and voluntarily given, that she was aware of the nature of the charges against her and the consequences of her plea, and that a factual basis existed for the tendered plea. The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty in Felony Case ("R&R") [Dkt. No. 47] finding a factual basis for the plea and recommending that this Court accept Defendant Slayton's plea of guilty to Count Two of the Indictment.

The magistrate judge also directed the parties to file any written objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after service of the R&R. He further advised that failure to file objections would result in a waiver of the right to appeal from a judgment of this Court based on the R&R. Neither the Defendant nor the Government filed objections to the R&R.

Accordingly, this Court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's R&R [Dkt. No. 47], provisionally ACCEPTS Defendant Slayton's guilty plea, and ADJUDGES her GUILTY of the crime charged in Count Two of the Indictment.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(3) and U.S.S.G. § 6B1.1(c), the Court DEFERS acceptance of the proposed plea agreement until it has received and reviewed the presentence investigation report prepared in this matter.

Pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 6A1 et seq., the Court ORDERS the following:

1. The Probation Officer shall undertake a presentence investigation of Slayton, and prepare a presentence investigation report for the Court;

2. The Government and Defendant Slayton shall each provide their narrative descriptions of the offense to the Probation Officer by November 4, 2020;

3. The presentence investigation report shall be disclosed to Defendant Slayton, counsel for Defendant, and the Government on or before January 4, 2021; however, the Probation Officer shall not disclose any sentencing recommendations made pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(e)(3);

4. Counsel may file written objections to the presentence investigation report on or before January 18, 2021;

5. The Office of Probation shall submit the presentence investigation report with addendum to the Court on or before February 1, 2021; and

6. Counsel may file any written sentencing memorandum or statements and motions for departure from the Sentencing Guidelines, including the factual basis for the same, on or before February 15, 2021.

The magistrate judge released Defendant Slayton on the terms of the Order Setting Conditions of Release [Dkt. No. 19].

The Court will conduct the Sentencing Hearing for Defendant on Friday, February 26, 2021, at 2:00 P.M., at the Elkins, West Virginia point of holding court. If counsel anticipates having multiple witnesses or an otherwise lengthy sentencing hearing, please notify the Judge's chamber staff so that an adequate amount of time can be scheduled.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to counsel of record and all appropriate agencies. DATED: October 26, 2020

/s/ Thomas S. Kleeh

THOMAS S. KLEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Slayton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
Oct 26, 2020
Crim. Action No.: 2:20cr23-2 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 26, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Slayton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MELISSA ANN SLAYTON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

Date published: Oct 26, 2020

Citations

Crim. Action No.: 2:20cr23-2 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 26, 2020)