From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Slayman

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Dec 18, 2019
No. 19-10572 (11th Cir. Dec. 18, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-10572

12-18-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRISTINE ALYCE SLAYMAN, a.k.a. Charli McKenna, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 3:18-cr-00044-TJC-PDB-1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, JORDAN and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Meghan Collins, appointed counsel for Christine Slayman in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Slayman's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Slayman

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Dec 18, 2019
No. 19-10572 (11th Cir. Dec. 18, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Slayman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRISTINE ALYCE SLAYMAN…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 18, 2019

Citations

No. 19-10572 (11th Cir. Dec. 18, 2019)

Citing Cases

Slayman v. United States

After an independent examination of the record, the Eleventh Circuit found “no arguable issues of merit” and…