From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Skipwith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Feb 29, 2016
Criminal No. JKB-14-092 (D. Md. Feb. 29, 2016)

Opinion

Criminal No. JKB-14-092 Civil No.-JFM-15-3267

02-29-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ERIC SKIPWITH


MEMORANDUM

Eric Skipwith has filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. §2255. The motion will be denied for several reasons.

First, although Skipwith now contends that his entry of the plea was unknowing and involuntary because of "misadvice" given to him by his attorney, he acknowledged (and this court found) at his rearraignment that the plea was voluntary and knowing.

Second, Skipwith ignores the fact that a notice could have been filed under 21 U.S.C. §851, subjecting him to a minimum mandatory sentence of ten years (120 months).

Third, this was a "C" plea pursuant to which the parties jointly agreed to recommend the sentence of between 70 and 87 months. This court sentenced Skipwith to 72 months.

Fourth, Skipwith emphasizes that many of his convictions were for drunk driving offenses. He indicates that they should not "count." However, the offenses were, in this court's judgment, serious ones which subjected members of the public to harm by the defendant. They obviously could have been taken into account by the court under 18 U.S.C. §3553.

A separate order denying Skipwith's motion is being filed herewith. Date: 2/29/16

/s/_________

J. Frederick Motz

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Skipwith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Feb 29, 2016
Criminal No. JKB-14-092 (D. Md. Feb. 29, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Skipwith

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ERIC SKIPWITH

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Date published: Feb 29, 2016

Citations

Criminal No. JKB-14-092 (D. Md. Feb. 29, 2016)