Opinion
Crim. No. 11-208 (SRC)
10-19-2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SIXING LIU
Hon, Stanley R. Chesler
ORDER
This matter having come before the Court on various motions of defendant Sixing Liu (James D. Tunick, Esq., appearing) and the United States of America (Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney, by L. Judson Welle and Gurbir S. Grewal, Assistant United States Attorneys, appearing), and the Court having heard the arguments of counsel, and such motions being moot or having been adjudicated upon oral rulings made during course of the trial in the above-referenced case, and for the reasons stated on the record at trial, and for good cause shown,
IT IS on this 19th day of Oct, 2012,
ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Strike as Surplusage Paragraph 27 of the Superseding Indictment (Docket Entry 51) is hereby DENIED AS MOOT; and it is further
ORDERED that the Government's Motion in Limine to Admit Evidence Under F.R.E. 404(b) 403 (Docket Entry 84) is hereby DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART; and it is further
ORDERED that the Government's Motion in Limine to Admit Evidence Under F.R.E. 404(b) and 403 (CORRECTED VERSION) (Docket Entry 85) is hereby DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART; and it is further
ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of internet Web Page Exhibits is hereby GRANTED.
____________________
HON. STANLEY R. CHESLER
United States District Judge