From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Simmons

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Oct 14, 2021
No. 21-1701 (8th Cir. Oct. 14, 2021)

Opinion

21-1701

10-14-2021

United States of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Heather Valentine Simmons Defendant-Appellant


Unpublished

Submitted: October 6, 2021

Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern

Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

Heather Simmons appeals the sentence the district court imposed after she pled guilty to a drug offense. Her counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentence. Simmons has also filed a pro se motion seeking appointment of new counsel.

The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.

After careful review, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Simmons. See United States v. Brown, 992 F.3d 665, 673 (8th Cir. 2021) (standard of review). We have also considered the issues raised in Simmons's pro se motion and conclude appointment of new counsel is not warranted. Furthermore, having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we deny Simmons's pro se motion, grant counsel leave to withdraw, and affirm.


Summaries of

United States v. Simmons

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Oct 14, 2021
No. 21-1701 (8th Cir. Oct. 14, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Simmons

Case Details

Full title:United States of America Plaintiff-Appellee v. Heather Valentine Simmons…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Oct 14, 2021

Citations

No. 21-1701 (8th Cir. Oct. 14, 2021)