From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Signal

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jan 12, 2022
CRIM. 16-232(FLW) (D.N.J. Jan. 12, 2022)

Opinion

CRIM. 16-232(FLW)

01-12-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DYVONTE SIGNAL


ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING

HONORABLE DOUGLAS E. ARPERT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In accordance with the operative COVID-19 Standing Orders, this Court finds:

[√] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

The proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[√] Video Teleconferencing

[ ] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[ ] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.

[ ] Other:


Summaries of

United States v. Signal

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jan 12, 2022
CRIM. 16-232(FLW) (D.N.J. Jan. 12, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Signal

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DYVONTE SIGNAL

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Jan 12, 2022

Citations

CRIM. 16-232(FLW) (D.N.J. Jan. 12, 2022)