From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Signal

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jan 12, 2022
16-cr-00232-FLW (D.N.J. Jan. 12, 2022)

Opinion

16-cr-00232-FLW

01-12-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. DYVONTE SIGNAL Defendants.


ORDER

HON. DOUGLAS E. ARPERT UNITED STATES-MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and as set forth on the record during the initial appearance of the defendant on this 12th day of January, 2022 in the presence of both the prosecutor and defense counsel in this matter, the Court confirms the United States' continuing obligation to produce all exculpatory evidence to the defendant pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and orders it to do so. Failing to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited to, the Court's order to produce information, the granting of a continuance, the exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, or sanctions by the Court.


Summaries of

United States v. Signal

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jan 12, 2022
16-cr-00232-FLW (D.N.J. Jan. 12, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Signal

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. DYVONTE SIGNAL Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Jan 12, 2022

Citations

16-cr-00232-FLW (D.N.J. Jan. 12, 2022)