From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Sigmond

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 23, 2022
1:20-CR-00160-DAD-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2022)

Opinion

1:20-CR-00160-DAD-BAM

06-23-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. IVAN SIGMOND Defendant.

PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney JESSICA A. MASSEY Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America


PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney JESSICA A. MASSEY Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America

PROTECTIVE ORDER

BARBARA A. MCAULIFFE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Application having been made to this court by the United States of America for an order pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(d) to disclose a portion of a Search Warrant Affidavit ordered sealed by the Fresno County Superior Court (referred to hereinafter as the “Subject Portion of the Affidavit”), in the above-entitled matter with the proposed redactions submitted as “Attachment C,” (Sealed Doc. 41, ECF page no. 12-13) and good cause having been shown by the United States in its motion as required by Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(d)(1), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the redacted version of the Subject Portion of the Affidavit submitted as “Attachment C,” for ex parte, in camera review, may be disclosed to defense counsel for use in the above-captioned matter.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT any retained or appointed defense counsel and staff, including but not limited to investigators and outside assistants, shall not discuss the contents of the redacted version of the Subject Portion of the Affidavit with the defendant, and shall not provide a copy of the redacted version of the Subject Portion of the Affidavit to the defendant. No copies may be given to any third party who is not a member of defendant's retained or appointed defense counsel or staff or hired as defense investigators or outside assistants.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order be served on anyone in the aforementioned class who will view a copy of the redacted version of the Subject Portion of the Affidavit.

The Defendant's Motion to Unseal (Doc. 35) is DENIED, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Sigmond

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 23, 2022
1:20-CR-00160-DAD-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Sigmond

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. IVAN SIGMOND Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 23, 2022

Citations

1:20-CR-00160-DAD-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2022)