From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Shriki

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 27, 2022
S1 22 Cr. 518 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 27, 2022)

Opinion

S1 22 Cr. 518 (PKC)

10-27-2022

United States of America v. Olga Shriki, Defendant.

Damian Williams United States Attorney Vladislav Vainberg/Anden Chow, Assistant United States Attorneys Bruce Maffeo, Esq. Counsel for Olga Shriki


Damian Williams United States Attorney

Vladislav Vainberg/Anden Chow, Assistant United States Attorneys

Bruce Maffeo, Esq. Counsel for Olga Shriki

PROTECTIVE ORDER

P. Kevin Castel, United States District Judge

Upon the application of the United States of America, by Damian Williams, United States Attorney, through its counsel, Vladislav Vainberg and Anden Chow, Assistant United States Attorneys ("the Government"), pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d), on consent of defendant Olga Shriki, through her counsel, J. Bruce Maffeo, Esq., and for good cause shown:

NOW, THEREFORE, FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. With the exception of otherwise publicly available documents and information, all materials, including documents and the information contained therein, that are provided by the Government to the defendant in this action pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3500; Brady v. Maryland; or United States v. Giglio, are considered "Confidential Information."

2. Confidential Information disclosed to the defendant or to her counsel in this case during the course of proceedings in this action:

(a) Shall be used by the defendant and her counsel only for purposes of defending this criminal action;

(b) Shall not be disclosed in any form by the defendant or her counsel except as set forth in paragraph 2(c) below; and

(c) May be disclosed by the defendant or her counsel in this action only to the following persons (hereinafter "Designated Persons"):

(i) investigative, secretarial, clerical, paralegal and student personnel employed full-time or part-time by the defendant's counsel;

(ii) independent expert witnesses, investigators, expert advisors, consultants and vendors retained - pursuant to a written retainer agreement - in connection with this action;

(iii) prospective witnesses, and their counsel, to the extent deemed necessary by defense counsel, for the purposes of the criminal proceedings in this case; and

(iv) such other persons as hereafter may be authorized by agreement, in writing, of the parties or by the Court upon the defendant's motion.

3. Confidential Information disclosed to the defendant or to her counsel during the course of proceedings in this action, including any and all copies made of said material, shall, at the conclusion of this matter, either be returned to the Government or shredded and destroyed. This matter will be concluded upon expiration of either the conclusion of any litigation related the above-captioned case, including direct appeal and collateral attack, or dismissal of the charges against the defendant.

4. The defendant or her counsel shall provide a copy of this Order to Designated Persons to whom they disclose Confidential Information pursuant to paragraphs 2(c)(ii)-(iv). Designated Persons shall be subject to the terms of this Order and, if they are given possession of any Confidential Information, shall sign an acknowledgment, to be retained by the defendant's counsel, indicating that they have received and reviewed the terms of this Order and understand that they are bound by it before being provided with any materials produced pursuant to terms of this Order. In addition, if Confidential Information is provided to any Designated Persons, those Designated Persons shall return or destroy such materials as set forth in paragraph 3.

5. The provisions of this Order shall not be construed as preventing the disclosure of any information in any motion, hearing or trial held in this action or to any district or magistrate judge of this Court for purposes of this action. Furthermore, the Government may at any time during the pendency of this proceeding designate documents or materials constituting Confidential Information as "Highly Confidential," when, in the good faith determination of the Government, disclosure of such documents or materials is prohibited by statute or regulation or otherwise is not in the public interest. The defendant and her counsel will not attach any materials designated Highly Confidential pursuant to this Order to any public filings with the Court or publicly disclose any such materials, or their contents in any other manner, without prior notice to the Government. If the defense and the Government cannot agree on the manner in which the documents or their contents may be publicly disclosed, the parties shall seek resolution of such disagreements by the Court.

6. If any dispute should arise between the parties to this action as to whether any documents, materials or other information is Confidential Information or Highly Confidential subject to the provisions of this Order, such documents, materials and information shall be considered Confidential Information or, if so designated pursuant to paragraph 5, Highly Confidential, pending further Order of this Court.

7. The defense shall provide a copy of this Order to prospective witnesses and persons retained by counsel to whom the defense has disclosed disclosure material or the Government's ESI production. All such persons shall be subject to the terms of this Order and shall be required to execute a consent to be bound by this Order. Defense counsel shall maintain a record of what information has been disclosed to which such persons.

8. This Order places no restriction on a defendant's use or disclosure of electronically stored information ("ESI") that originally belonged to the defendant, except, for the avoidance of doubt, any ESI that has been designated as Highly Confidential materials shall be subject to the full restrictions of this Order.

Retention of Jurisdiction

9. The provisions of this order shall not terminate at the conclusion of this criminal prosecution and the Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce this Order following termination of the case.

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

United States v. Shriki

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 27, 2022
S1 22 Cr. 518 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 27, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Shriki

Case Details

Full title:United States of America v. Olga Shriki, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 27, 2022

Citations

S1 22 Cr. 518 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 27, 2022)