From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Short

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 23, 2012
No.2:12-cr-164 JAM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2012)

Opinion

No.2:12-cr-164 JAM

07-23-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES KIRK SHORT, Defendant.

Todd Pickles Assistant United States Attorney Counsel for Plaintiff Jeffrey L. Staniels Assistant Federal Defender Counsel for Defendant JAMES KIRK SHORT


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

JEFFREY L. STANIELS, Bar #91413

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

JAMES KIRK SHORT

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE


Date: July 24, 2012

Judge: John A. Mendez

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among Assistant United States Attorney Todd Pickles, counsel for Plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender Jeffrey L. Staniels, counsel for defendant, JAMES KIRK SHORT, that the status conference now set for July 24, 2012, be vacated and the matter continued to October 16, 2012 at 9:45 a.m. Investigation which include out of district travel and consultation including exploration of possible resolution of the charges without trial have commenced and are on-going. Counsel for the parties expect that any shorter time period might well not be sufficient to complete that process.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the interests of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweighs the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and that time should be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 et. seq., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). and Local Code T-4.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

______________________

Todd Pickles

Assistant United States Attorney

Counsel for Plaintiff

______________________

Jeffrey L. Staniels

Assistant Federal Defender

Counsel for Defendant

JAMES KIRK SHORT

ORDER

Based on the above representations of counsel the court finds that the requested continuance is appropriate and that the interests of justice served thereby outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The requested continuance is therefore GRANTED. Time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 et. seq., is excluded from July 24, 2012, through October 16, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), Local Code T-4.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

By the Court,

______________________

Hon. John A. Mendez

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Short

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 23, 2012
No.2:12-cr-164 JAM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Short

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES KIRK SHORT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 23, 2012

Citations

No.2:12-cr-164 JAM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2012)