From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Shinen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 3, 2012
CASE NO.: CR 12-00150-DLB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO.: CR 12-00150-DLB

07-03-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PHILLIP JACOB SHINEN, Defendant.

Victor Sherman, Esq. (SBN: 38483) SHERMAN & SHERMAN A Professional Law Corporation Attorneys for Defendant PHILLIP JACOB SHINEN


Victor Sherman, Esq. (SBN: 38483)

SHERMAN & SHERMAN

A Professional Law Corporation

Attorneys for Defendant

PHILLIP JACOB SHINEN

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL APPEARANCE; ORDER THEREON


Date: July 16, 2012

Dept.: Hon. Dennis L. Beck

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that the initial appearance in this District for defendant PHILLIP JACOB SHINEN, in the above-referenced action now scheduled for July 9, 2012 is continued to July 16, 2012, at 1:30 p.m., before U.S. Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck. This date has been confirmed by the court clerk.

The continuance of the initial appearance is being requested by the parties so that the parties can commence negotiations, the defense can review discovery to facilitate those negotiations, to address scheduling conflicts of defense counsel, and to afford the defendant time to arrange for travel from his home in southern California.

The parties agree that the time between the date of this stipulation and the new status conference date of July 16, 2012, shall be excluded in the interests of justice, including but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for effective defense preparation and continuity of counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv).

Respectfully submitted,

SHERMAN & SHERMAN

A Professional Law Corporation

By: __________

VICTOR SHERMAN

Attorney for Defendant

Phillip Jacob Shinen

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: _____

HENRY Z. CARBAJAL III

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation, time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 316(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv). IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Shinen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 3, 2012
CASE NO.: CR 12-00150-DLB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Shinen

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PHILLIP JACOB SHINEN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 3, 2012

Citations

CASE NO.: CR 12-00150-DLB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2012)