From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Shigley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION
Nov 9, 2016
CR-09-115-GF-BMM-01 (D. Mont. Nov. 9, 2016)

Opinion

CR-09-115-GF-BMM-01

11-09-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ZEAN SHIGLEY, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston entered Findings and Recommendations in this matter October 24, 2016. (Doc. 52.) Neither party filed objections. When a party makes no objections, the Court need not review de novo the proposed Findings and Recommendations. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1986). This Court will review Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations, however, for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).

Judge Johnston conducted a revocation hearing on October 20, 2016. (Doc. 49.) Shigley admitted that he violated the conditions of his supervised release by failing to complete sex offender treatment. The violations prove serious and warrant revocation of Shigley's supervised release. Judge Johnston has recommended that the Court revoke Shigley's supervised release and commit Shigley to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons for two months (Doc. 52 at 4.) Judge Johnston further has recommended that Shigley's term of custody be followed by 118 months of supervised release. Id.

The Court finds no clear error in Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations. Shigley's violations of his conditions represent a serious breach of the Court's trust. A sentence of two months custody followed by 118 months of supervised release represents a sufficient, but not greater than necessary, sentence.

IT IS ORDERED that Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 52) is ADOPTED IN FULL.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Scott Zean Shigley be sentenced to two months custody followed by 118 months of supervised release. The conditions previously imposed shall be continued.

DATED this 9th day of November, 2016.

/s/_________

Brian Morris

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Shigley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION
Nov 9, 2016
CR-09-115-GF-BMM-01 (D. Mont. Nov. 9, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Shigley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ZEAN SHIGLEY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION

Date published: Nov 9, 2016

Citations

CR-09-115-GF-BMM-01 (D. Mont. Nov. 9, 2016)