Opinion
23-1660
01-24-2024
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANDREW JOSEPH SHIELDS, Defendant-Appellant.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana D.C. No. 9:22-cr-00056-DWM-1 Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding
BEFORE: S.R. THOMAS, MCKEOWN, AND HURWITZ, CIRCUIT JUDGES.
MEMORANDUM
Andrew Joseph Shields appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 135-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute controlled substances, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Shields's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Shields the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Shields waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).