From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Sherrod

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Feb 22, 2024
No. 24-1022 (D.N.J. Feb. 22, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-mj-01022-ADB

02-22-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CALVIN SHERROD


ORBER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING

Honorable Elizabeth A, Pascal United States Magistrate Judge

In accordance with the operative COVID-19 Standing Orders, this Court finds:

[√] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferenoing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

The proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[√] Video Teleconferencing

[ ] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the folio whig reason:

[ ] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.

[ ] Other:


Summaries of

United States v. Sherrod

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Feb 22, 2024
No. 24-1022 (D.N.J. Feb. 22, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Sherrod

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CALVIN SHERROD

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Feb 22, 2024

Citations

No. 24-1022 (D.N.J. Feb. 22, 2024)