From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Sher

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 8, 1969
418 F.2d 914 (9th Cir. 1969)

Opinion

No. 23748.

December 8, 1969.

William H. Mullen, Seattle, Wash., for appellant.

John M. Darrah, Asst. U.S. Atty., Eugene G. Cushing, U.S. Atty., Seattle, Wash., for appellee.

Before MERRILL, KOELSCH and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.


Appellant was convicted of selling Government property without authority in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. The property sold was a blank selective service registration form or "draft card." There was no proof of how it came into appellant's possession.

Appellant contends that to establish guilt under § 641 the Government has the burden of proving that the property sold was stolen from the Government. He asserts that there was no such proof here. He assigns as error the failure of the court so to instruct the jury.

We must reject appellant's contentions. He was not charged with theft or with sale of stolen property. He was charged with sale of Government property without authority. Theft is not an element of this offense; Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 72 S.Ct. 240, 96 L.Ed. 288 (1952), is inapplicable.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Sher

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 8, 1969
418 F.2d 914 (9th Cir. 1969)
Case details for

United States v. Sher

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel H. SHER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 8, 1969

Citations

418 F.2d 914 (9th Cir. 1969)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Barger

It is unnecessary under § 641 to prove that the EPIC manual was stolen, although this was alleged in the…

United States v. Jones

Thus, Jones' acquisition of the information without wrongdoing is not necessarily fatal to the complaint. See…