From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Shehata

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 7, 2011
NO. CR-S-10-259 JAM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)

Opinion

NO. CR-S-10-259 JAM

10-07-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ATEF SHEHATA, et al., Defendants.

Respectfully Submitted DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender DENNIS S. WAKS Supervising Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Atef Shehata Dennis S. Waks for ALAN EISNER Attorney for ATIF HENAN Dennis S. Waks for HARVEY E. BYRON Attorney for SAMY GIRGIS Dennis S. Waks for ROBERT M HELFEND Attorney for SOHEIR GIRGIS Dennis S. Waks for PETER M. WILLIAMS Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Dennis S. Waks for R. STEVEN LAPHAM, U.S. Attorney


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Federal Defender

DENNIS S. WAKS, Bar #142581

Supervising Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

ATEF SHEHATA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER


Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the United States of America, through its undersigned counsel, Assistant United States Attorney R. Steven Lapham, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Peter M. Williams, and defendants Atef Shehata, through his undersigned counsel Supervising Assistant Federal Defender Dennis S. Waks, Atif Henan, through his undersigned counsel Alan Eisner, defendant Samy Girgis, through his undersigned counsel Harvey E. Byron, and defendant Soheir Girgis, through her undersigned counsel Robert Helfend, that the status conference presently set in this matter for October 11, 2011 be continued to November 29, 2011, at 9:30 a.m.

The parties stipulate and agree that the setting is necessary to permit defense counsel to review discovery of approximately 12,000 pages provided by the government.

The parties further stipulate and agree that this is a complex case within the meaning of 18 U.S.C § 3161 (h)(7)(B)(ii) and that the exclusion of time during the period needed for defense counsel's reasonable time for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence within the meaning of 18 U.S.C § 3161 (h) (7)(B)(iv), and that the ends of justice served by granting exclusion of time therefore outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 3161 (h) (7)(A); time should be excluded from the date of this order to the new date of November 29, 2011.

Respectfully Submitted

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

DENNIS S. WAKS

Supervising Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Atef Shehata

Dennis S. Waks for

ALAN EISNER Attorney for

ATIF HENAN

Dennis S. Waks for

HARVEY E. BYRON Attorney for

SAMY GIRGIS

Dennis S. Waks for

ROBERT M HELFEND Attorney for

SOHEIR GIRGIS

Dennis S. Waks for

PETER M. WILLIAMS

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Dennis S. Waks for

R. STEVEN LAPHAM, U.S. Attorney

ORDER

The status conference is continued to November 29, 2011, at 9:30 a.m. For the reasons set forth above, the court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial and therefore excludes time under the Speedy Trial Act through November 29, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Shehata

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 7, 2011
NO. CR-S-10-259 JAM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Shehata

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ATEF SHEHATA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 7, 2011

Citations

NO. CR-S-10-259 JAM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)