From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Shaynyuk

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 5, 2013
13-CR-00250-JAM (E.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2013)

Opinion

          BENGAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, KYLE REARDON, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Attorney for Plaintiff.

          KYLE R. KNAPP, ATTORNEY AT LAW, Sacramento, CA, Attorney for Defendant OREST SHAYNYUK.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE AND EXCLUDING TIME

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY stipulated between the United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Kyle Reardon, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for plaintiff, together with Kyle Knapp, attorney for defendant Orest Shaynyuk that the previously-scheduled status conference, currently set for December 10, 2013, be vacated and that the matter be set for status conference on February 4, 2013 at 9:45 a.m.

         This continuance is requested to allow defense counsel additional time to further review the discovery in this matter, confer with his expert regarding the forensic evidence and endeavor to iron out the final details of the plea agreement in this case.

         IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the ends of justice served by the granting of such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and that time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act should therefore be excluded under 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(7)(B) (iv), corresponding to Local Code T-4 (to allow defense counsel time to prepare) from the date of the parties' stipulation, December 5, 2013 up to and including February 4, 2014.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

          ORDER

         The Stipulation of the parties is hereby accepted and the requested continuance is GRANTED. This matter shall be dropped from this court's December 10, 2013 criminal calendar and re-calendared for status conference on February 4, 2014.

         Based on the representations of the parties the court finds that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Time is excluded from the time of the filing of this stipulation on December 5, 2013 through and including February 4, 2014.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Shaynyuk

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 5, 2013
13-CR-00250-JAM (E.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Shaynyuk

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. OREST SHAYNYUK. Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 5, 2013

Citations

13-CR-00250-JAM (E.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2013)