From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Shanklin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
May 12, 2021
No. 20-14256 (11th Cir. May. 12, 2021)

Opinion

No. 20-14256

05-12-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CLARENCE GENE SHANKLIN, SR., Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 6:02-cr-00073-LSC-GMB-23 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

W. Scott Brower, appointed counsel for Clarence Gene Shanklin, Sr., in this criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Shanklin's revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Shanklin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
May 12, 2021
No. 20-14256 (11th Cir. May. 12, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Shanklin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CLARENCE GENE SHANKLIN…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 12, 2021

Citations

No. 20-14256 (11th Cir. May. 12, 2021)