From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Sevilla-Mancilla

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 12, 2003
84 F. App'x 800 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion

Submitted December 8, 2003.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Irma E. Gonzalez, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-02-02715-IEG.

Orlando Gutierrez, USSD-Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jeanne G. Knight, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.


Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Jose Sevilla-Mancilla appeals the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Sevilla-Mancilla contends that the district court improperly applied a sixteen-level upward adjustment under U.S. S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) based on prior convictions that were obtained in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel and while he was incompetent.

We affirm because Sevilla-Mancilla is not entitled to collaterally attack his prior convictions on these grounds. Custis v. United States, 511 U.S. 485, 114 S.Ct. 1732, 128 L.Ed.2d 517 (1994) (holding that the Constitution requires only that collateral attacks be allowed against predicate convictions obtained in violation of the right to appointed counsel, and that ineffective assistance of counsel does not rise to the level of the jurisdictional defect resulting from the failure to appoint counsel); United States v. Martinez-Martinez, 295 F.3d 1041, 1043-45 (9th Cir.2002) (holding in a § 1326 case that collateral attacks on prior state convictions at sentencing

Page 801.

are prohibited); United States v. Gutierrez-Cervantez, 132 F.3d 460, 462 (9th Cir.1997) (applying Custis to preclude collateral attacks on prior state convictions in § 1326 proceedings).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Sevilla-Mancilla

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 12, 2003
84 F. App'x 800 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

United States v. Sevilla-Mancilla

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Jose SEVILLA-MANCILLA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 12, 2003

Citations

84 F. App'x 800 (9th Cir. 2003)