From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. See

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 25, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-mj-00088 SKO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-mj-00088 SKO

01-25-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. THAI SEE, Defendant.

ROBERT A. CASSIO SBN: 170197 Law Office of Robert A. Cassio Attorney for Defendant THAI SEE


ROBERT A. CASSIO SBN: 170197

Law Office of Robert A. Cassio

Attorney for Defendant THAI SEE

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTIONS

SCHEDULE; ORDER THEREON

Date: March 22, 2012

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Dept.: 9

Honorable Dennis L. Beck

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, that a new motions schedule be set, however, the hearing on motions currently scheduled for March 22, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. before the Honorable Dennis L. Beck remain as scheduled. The requested new motions schedule is as follows:

+-----------------------------------------------------+ ¦Event: ¦Present Date: ¦Requested New Date: ¦ +-------------+-----------------+---------------------¦ ¦Motions Due ¦December 16, 2011¦February 9, 2012 ¦ +-------------+-----------------+---------------------¦ ¦Replies Due ¦January 20, 2012 ¦March 1, 2012 ¦ +-------------+-----------------+---------------------¦ ¦Responses Due¦February 10, 2012¦March 8, 2012 ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------+

The continuance is requested by counsel for the Defendant to allow the parties additional time to attempt to investigate, confer and potentially resolve this matter. New counsel for the Government has recently been assigned and it is possible that the parties may be able to resolve the matter without the necessity of motions. The revised schedule has been discussed and agreed to by Special Assistant United States Attorney Wallace J. Lee and Attorney Robert A. Cassio. The requested continuance will conserve time and resources for all parties and the Court.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice, including but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for further defense preparation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) in that the ends will be served by a continuance.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

_____________________

WALLACE J. LEE

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

This was agreed to by Mr. Lee via email on January 24, 2012

_____________________

ROBERT A. CASSIO

Attorney for Defendant

THAI SEE

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. See

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 25, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-mj-00088 SKO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. See

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. THAI SEE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 25, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-mj-00088 SKO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2012)