Opinion
14-cr-20780
07-20-2021
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CURTIS SCOTT, Defendant.
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO RE-REVIEW COMPASSIONATE RELEASE AND TO REQUEST A LAWYER (ECF No. 659)
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On March 9, 2016, a jury convicted Defendant Curtis Scott of aiding and abetting a carjacking, aiding and abetting the discharge of a gun in furtherance of a carjacking, and making false statements to a federal law enforcement officer. (See Verdict Form, ECF No. 92.) The Court sentenced Scott to a term of 180 months in custody. (See Judgment, ECF No. 585, PageID.5660.)
Order, ECF No. 658.) Before Scott received notice of the Court's July 15 order, he filed a second motion for compassionate release and for the appointment of counsel. (See Mot., ECF No. 659.) For all of the reasons stated in the Court's July 15 order, the Court remains persuaded that Scott is not entitled to compassionate release and is not entitled to the appointment of counsel. Scott's currently pending motion for compassionate release and for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 659) is therefore DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on July 20, 2021, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail.