From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Schroeder

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
Sep 28, 2023
05-cr-10006-02 (W.D. La. Sep. 28, 2023)

Opinion

05-cr-10006-02

09-28-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIAM GLEN SCHROEDER (02) v.


MAG. JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

ORDER

DEE D. DRELL, SENIOR JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Before the court is Schroeder's motion to appoint counsel to assist with the filing of a motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). (Doc. 108). There is no constitutional right to appointed counsel in post-conviction proceedings. Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987). See also United States v. Whitebird, 55 F.3d 1007,1010 (5th Cir.1995) and United States v. Moore, 400 Fed.Appx. 851, 852 (5th Cir. 2010) (per curiam)). Moreover, the First Step Act does not provide for the appointment of counsel for those seeking relief under §3582(c)(1)(A). Although appointment of counsel may be allowed when “the court determines the interests of justice so require,” United States v. Robinson, 542 F.3d 1042, 1051-52 (5th Cir.2008), Schroeder has failed to show such circumstances exist here. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the motion to appoint counsel (Doc. 108) is Denied.


Summaries of

United States v. Schroeder

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
Sep 28, 2023
05-cr-10006-02 (W.D. La. Sep. 28, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Schroeder

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIAM GLEN SCHROEDER (02) v.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana

Date published: Sep 28, 2023

Citations

05-cr-10006-02 (W.D. La. Sep. 28, 2023)