From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Scherma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 1, 2013
No. CR 12-855 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 1, 2013)

Opinion

No. CR 12-855 WHA

05-01-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. VITO SCHERMA, Defendant.

JEFFREY BORNSTEIN K&L GATES LLP Counsel for Defendant Vito Scherma MELINDA HAAG HARTLEY M. K. WEST Assistant U.S. Attorney


MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630)
Chief, Criminal Division
HARTLEY M. K. WEST (CABN 191609)
Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Ave., Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7200

Fax: (415) 436-7234

E-Mail: hartley.west@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for the United States of America

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME FROM

APRIL 23, 2013, THROUGH

JULY 29, 2013

The defendant, VITO SCHERMA, represented by Jeffrey Bornstein, and the government, represented by Assistant United States Attorney Hartley West, appeared before the Court for status on April 23, 2013. The Court scheduled the trial for July 29, 2013; the pretrial conference for July 22, 2013; the motions hearing for June 11, 2013; and motion filing deadline for May 14, 2013. The defense agreed to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act between April 23 and July 29, 2013, for effective preparation of defense counsel. The government and the Court concurred.

Based upon the representation of counsel and for good cause shown, the Court finds that failing to exclude the time between April 23 and July 29, 2013, would unreasonably deny defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The Court further finds that the ends of justice served by excluding the time between April 23 and July 29, 2013, from computation under the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time between April 23 and July 29, 2013, shall be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

______________

HON. WILLIAM H. ALSUP

United States District Judge
Approved as to form:

______________

JEFFREY BORNSTEIN

K&L GATES LLP

Counsel for Defendant Vito Scherma

MELINDA HAAG

______________

HARTLEY M. K. WEST

Assistant U.S. Attorney


Summaries of

United States v. Scherma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 1, 2013
No. CR 12-855 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 1, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Scherma

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. VITO SCHERMA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: May 1, 2013

Citations

No. CR 12-855 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 1, 2013)