From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Scannell

United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana
Dec 13, 2023
2:23-CR-106 JD (N.D. Ind. Dec. 13, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-CR-106 JD

12-13-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RANDI SCANNELL


ORDER

JON E. DEGUILIO, JUDGE

No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's findings and recommendation upon a plea of guilty issued on November 27, 2023 [DE 8]. Accordingly, the Court now ADOPTS those findings and recommendations, ACCEPTS defendant Randi Scannell's plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant guilty of Count 1 of the Information, for violating 18 U.S.C. § 1343.

Any objections a party submits to the probation officer in response to the draft Presentence Report must specifically identify the basis of the objection and any supporting authority. Should the Addendum to the Final Presentence Report reflect any outstanding objections by a party, that party must specifically state in its sentencing memorandum whether it maintains that objection. If so, the party must identify the basis and authority for its objection and, where applicable, any evidence the party expects to offer in support of that objection. The party should also state if, consistent with Rule 32(i)(3)(B), it does not believe a ruling on that objection will be necessary.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Scannell

United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana
Dec 13, 2023
2:23-CR-106 JD (N.D. Ind. Dec. 13, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Scannell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RANDI SCANNELL

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana

Date published: Dec 13, 2023

Citations

2:23-CR-106 JD (N.D. Ind. Dec. 13, 2023)