From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Santiago-Martinez

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Aug 30, 2021
2:21-cr-61-SPC-NPM (M.D. Fla. Aug. 30, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cr-61-SPC-NPM

08-30-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SIMON SANTIAGO-MARTINEZ


ORDER

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Under the Court's Administrative Order, Case No. 8:20-mc-25 (Doc. 1), which implements the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES”), the Court may conduct the sentencing hearing by video conferencing with Defendant SIMON SANTIAGO-MARTINEZ'S consent after he confers with counsel.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

(1) On or before October 8, 2021 at NOON, counsel for Defendant SIMON SANTIAGO-MARTINEZ must file a written notice advising the Court:

a. whether Defendant, after consulting with defense counsel, consents to proceed with the sentencing hearing by video conferencing and by telephone if video is not reasonably available;
b. why delaying the sentencing will result in serious harm to the interests of justice; and c. the Government's position on a videoconference sentencing hearing.

(2) If Defendant's counsel advises that Defendant consents to proceed with the hearing by video conferencing, the Clerk is DIRECTED to notice the hearing and provide all hearing participants with instructions for joining the hearing.

(3) The Court will address the specific findings required by the CARES Act at the video conference sentencing hearing.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Santiago-Martinez

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Aug 30, 2021
2:21-cr-61-SPC-NPM (M.D. Fla. Aug. 30, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Santiago-Martinez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SIMON SANTIAGO-MARTINEZ

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Aug 30, 2021

Citations

2:21-cr-61-SPC-NPM (M.D. Fla. Aug. 30, 2021)