From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Sanots

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 8, 2024
20 Crim. 398 (GBD) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2024)

Opinion

20 Crim. 398 (GBD)

01-08-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GUTEMBERG DOS SANTOS, PABLO RENATO RODRIGUEZ, SCOTT HUGHES, CECILIA MILLAN, and KARINA CHAIREZ, Defendants.


ORDER

GEORGE B. DANIELS, United States District Judge:

Upon the Government's December 21,2023 motion (ECF No. 279), to which no Defendant objected, this Court finds, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(c)(3), that (1) restitution is impracticable in this case due to the large number of victims, and (2) a determination of each victim's losses “would complicate or prolong the sentencing process to a degree that the need to provide restitution to any victim is outweighed by the burden on the sentencing process.” 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(C)(3)(A)-(B). This Court GRANTS the Government motion and authorizes the Government to compensate victims with finally forfeited assets through the remission process.

The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at ECF No. 279.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Sanots

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 8, 2024
20 Crim. 398 (GBD) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Sanots

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GUTEMBERG DOS SANTOS, PABLO RENATO RODRIGUEZ…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 8, 2024

Citations

20 Crim. 398 (GBD) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2024)