From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Sanots

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 29, 2022
1:22-cr-522-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cr-522-GHW

12-29-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. CHRISTOPHER SANTOS, Defendant.


ORDER

GREGORY H. WOODS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On December 23, 2022, the Court received an email from Mr. Santos requesting a modification of the conditions of his pre-trial release. The Court provided counsel the opportunity to request redactions to the email, and because no such request was made, docketed the email in full at Dkt. No. 17.

The Court does not expect to respond to Mr. Santos's email. “There is no constitutional right to hybrid representation ....” United States v. Schmidt, 105 F.3d 82, 90 (2d Cir. 1997). Mr. Santos has counsel. On December 22, 2022, the day before Mr. Santos's email, the Court denied an application by Mr. Santos's counsel to modify the conditions of Mr. Santos' pre-trial release. See Dkt. No. 16. Because Mr. Santos is represented, and his counsel made substantially the same application to the Court a day before, there is no reason for the Court to entertain a separate application by Mr. Santos. As a result, the Court expects to take no action with respect to Mr. Santos's December 23, 2022 email.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Sanots

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 29, 2022
1:22-cr-522-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Sanots

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. CHRISTOPHER SANTOS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 29, 2022

Citations

1:22-cr-522-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2022)