From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Sanjurjo

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 27, 2013
540 F. App'x 186 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-7037

2013-09-27

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID SANJURJO, a/k/a Mickey, Defendant - Appellant.

David Sanjurjo, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin L. Hatch, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:98-cr-00338-REP-1) Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Sanjurjo, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin L. Hatch, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Sanjurjo appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sanjurjo, No. 3:98-cr-00338-REP-1 (E.D. Va. May 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Sanjurjo

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 27, 2013
540 F. App'x 186 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Sanjurjo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID SANJURJO, a/k/a…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 27, 2013

Citations

540 F. App'x 186 (4th Cir. 2013)