Opinion
2:19-cr-00258-RAJ
10-17-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LOUIE SANFT, Defendant.
ORDER
Honorable Richard A. Jones, United States District Judge
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Louie Sanft's Motion for Bail Pending Appeal. Dkt. 389. Having considered the briefing, relevant record, and applicable law, the Court finds that Defendant Louie Sanft has failed to establish that his appeal will raise “substantial issues of law or fact of the type that are likely to result in reversal or a new trial if the defendant prevails on appeal,” as that standard has been interpreted by the Ninth Circuit in United States v. Garcia, 340 F.3d 1013, 1020 n.5 (9th Cir. 2003) and United States v. Handy, 761 F.2d 1279, 1283 (9th Cir. 1985).
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Louie Sanft's Motion for Bail Pending Appeal is DENIED.