From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Sandoval

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 2, 2011
Case No.: 09-276 JAM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 09-276 JAM

08-02-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JESUS SANDOVAL, et al., Defendants.

HEIKO COPPOLA Attorney for Plaintiff CLEMENTE M. JIMENEZ Attorney for Jesus Sandoval


CLEMENTE M. JIMENEZ, SBN 207136

Attorney for Defendant

JESUS SANDOVAL

STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING DATE, CONTINUING CASE, AND EXCLUDING TIME

JUDGE: Hon. John A. Mendez

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Heiko Coppola, Counsel for Plaintiff, and Attorney Clemente M. Jimenez, Counsel for Defendant JESUS SANDOVAL, that the status conference scheduled for August 2, 2011, at 9:30 a.m., be vacated and the matter continued to this Court's criminal calendar on August 9, 2011, at 9:30 a.m. for anticipated change of plea.

Defense counsel seeks additional time to discuss the case with Mr. Sandoval and to secure the services of an interpreter to translate the plea agreement for him.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3161 et seq. be tolled pursuant to Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), (Local code T-4), and that the ends of justice served in granting the continuance and allowing the defendants further time to prepare outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant to a speedy trial.

HEIKO COPPOLA

Attorney for Plaintiff

CLEMENTE M. JIMENEZ

Attorney for Jesus Sandoval

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED, that the status conference in the above-entitled matter, scheduled for August 2, 2011, at 9:30 a.m., be vacated and the matter continued to August 9, 2011, at 9:30 a.m. for anticipated change of plea. The Court finds that time under the Speedy Trial Act shall be excluded through that date in order to afford counsel reasonable time to prepare. Based on the parties' representations, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants to a speedy trial.

HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Sandoval

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 2, 2011
Case No.: 09-276 JAM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Sandoval

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JESUS SANDOVAL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 2, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 09-276 JAM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)