From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Sanders

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 18, 2022
2:20-cr-00090-CDS-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 18, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cr-00090-CDS-VCF

08-18-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SANDERS, MEGAN GOODIN, and QUNEIL GASTON Defendants.


ORDER DENYING STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE CALENDAR CALL AND TRIAL (SEVENTH REQUEST) (ECF NO. 88)

Cristina D. Silva United States District Court Judge

This matter comes before the Court on the parties' stipulation to continue calendar call and trial. ECF No. 88. The parties request that the Court move the trial date from September 12, 2022, to a date no sooner than sixty (60) days. They also request that the Court adjust all pretrial deadlines accordingly. The only reason the parties give for this request is that “[t]he parties require additional time to review the discovery and determine whether there are issues that must be litigated before proceeding to trial.” Id.

The Court will not continue the trial date unless there is good cause to do so. Without more information, the parties' vague statement that additional time to review discovery does not suffice, especially given this is the seventh request. Therefore, the seventh request to continue calendar call and trial is DENIED.


Summaries of

United States v. Sanders

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 18, 2022
2:20-cr-00090-CDS-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 18, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Sanders

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SANDERS, MEGAN GOODIN, and…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 18, 2022

Citations

2:20-cr-00090-CDS-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 18, 2022)