From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Sanchez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 26, 2011
No. CR-S-10-254 LKK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)

Opinion

No. CR-S-10-254 LKK

10-26-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ARTURO SANCHEZ, Defendant.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, #89424 Federal Defender CARO MARKS, Bar #159267 Designated Counsel for Service Attorney for Defendant ARTURO SANCHEZ


DANIEL J. BRODERICK, #89424

Federal Defender

CARO MARKS, Bar #159267

Designated Counsel for Service

Attorney for Defendant

ARTURO SANCHEZ

ORDER AFTER HEARING

This matter came on calendar for a status conference hearing on October 25, 2011, in the courtroom of the Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton, Senior Judge. Assistant United States Attorney Kyle Reardon appeared for the United States of America. Assistant Federal Defender Caro Marks appeared on behalf of Defendant Arturo Sanchez, who was present before the court.

Defense counsel requested that this matter be set for further status conference on December 20, 2011. Counsel informed the court that the defense is conducting a forensic examination of the computer(s) in question, and a continuance is necessary because the law enforcement agents in possession of the computer(s) are experiencing technical difficulties with the external hard drives, examination of which is vital to the completion of the analysis. Thus, defense counsel requested an exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act to allow the parties to complete their analysis of the computer forensics in the case.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter be set for further status conference on December 20, 2011 at 9:15 am..

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), and Local Code T4, the period from October 24, 2011, up to and including December 20, 2011, is excluded from the time computations required by the Speedy Trial Act due to counsel preparation. The court finds the ends of justice served in granting the continuance and allowing the defendant further time to prepare outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

LAWRBMCE K. KARLTONN

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Sanchez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 26, 2011
No. CR-S-10-254 LKK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Sanchez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ARTURO SANCHEZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 26, 2011

Citations

No. CR-S-10-254 LKK (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)