Opinion
Case No.: 10-473 WBS
10-13-2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FABIAN PINEDA SANCHEZ, et al., Defendants.
HEIKO COPPOLA Attorney for Plaintiff CLEMENTE M. JIMÉNEZ Attorney for Taurino Mondragon GILBERT ROQUE Attorney for Fabian Sanchez DINA SANTOS Attorney for Salvador Mondragon
CLEMENTE M. JIMÉNEZ, SBN 207136
428 J Street, Suite 355
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 443-8055
Attorney for Defendant
TAURINO MONDRAGON
STIPULATION AND ORDER
VACATING DATE, CONTINUING
CASE, AND EXCLUDING TIME
JUDGE: Hon. William B. Shubb IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Heiko Coppola, Counsel for Plaintiff, and Attorneys Clemente M. Jiménez, Counsel for Defendant TAURINO MONDRAGON, Gilbert Roque, Counsel for Defendant Fabian Sanchez, and Dina Santos, Counsel for Defendant Salvador Mondragon, that the status conference scheduled for October 17, 2011, at 9:30 a.m., be vacated and the matter continued to this Court's criminal calendar on December 5, 2011, at 9:30 a.m. for further status conference. Defense counsel has a request for information to the government pending, in addition to requiring further time to investigate certain claims by Mr. Mondragon.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3161 et seq. be tolled pursuant to Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), (Local code T-4), and that the ends of justice served in granting the continuance and allowing the defendants further time to prepare outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant to a speedy trial.
HEIKO COPPOLA
Attorney for Plaintiff
CLEMENTE M. JIMÉNEZ
Attorney for Taurino Mondragon
GILBERT ROQUE
Attorney for Fabian Sanchez
DINA SANTOS
Attorney for Salvador Mondragon
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED, that the status conference in the above-entitled matter, scheduled for October 17, 2011, at 9:30 a.m., be vacated and the matter continued to December 5, 2011, at 9:30 a.m., for further status conference. The Court finds that time under the Speedy Trial Act shall be excluded through that date in order to afford counsel reasonable time to prepare. Based on the parties' representations, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants to a speedy trial.
WILLIAM B. SHUBB
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE