From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Samuel

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Sep 10, 2021
Crim 20-mj-06013-DEA (D.N.J. Sep. 10, 2021)

Opinion

Crim 20-mj-06013-DEA

09-10-2021

UNITED STATES v. DEVIN SAMUEL


ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING

Honorable Douglas E. Arpert, United States Magistrate Judge.

In accordance with Standing Order 2020-06, this Court finds:

[√] That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceedings) held today, after consultation with counsel; and

The proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

[√] Video Teleconferencing

[ ] Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the following reason:

[ ] The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video teleconferencing capability.

[ ] Other:


Summaries of

United States v. Samuel

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Sep 10, 2021
Crim 20-mj-06013-DEA (D.N.J. Sep. 10, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Samuel

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES v. DEVIN SAMUEL

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Sep 10, 2021

Citations

Crim 20-mj-06013-DEA (D.N.J. Sep. 10, 2021)