From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Salyer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Sep 12, 2011
Case No. 2:10-CR-0061-LKK (GGH) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-CR-0061-LKK (GGH)

09-12-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FREDERICK SCOTT SALYER, Defendant.

JOHN W. KEKER Attorney for Defendant FREDERICK SCOTT SALYER MATTHEW D. SEGAL Assistant United States Attorney


KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

JOHN W. KEKER - #49092

ELLIOT R. PETERS - #158708

BRIAN L. FERRALL - #160847

SEGAL & KIRBY LLP

MALCOLM S. SEGAL - #075481

Attorneys for Defendant

FREDERICK SCOTT SALYER

STIPULATION AND ORDER

Judge: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

Date Comp. Filed: February 18, 2010

WHEREAS, this matter is currently scheduled for a motions hearing on September 22, 2011. Due to scheduling conflicts, not all parties are able to attend a September 22, 2011 hearing date. The parties have met and conferred and agreed to continue the hearing date to September 23, 2011 at 10:00 am.

WHEREAS, the parties have also met and conferred about a suitable briefing schedule for the next round of motions, except for any motion based upon due process violations arising from outrageous government conduct. Based upon that meet and confer, the parties hereby stipulate and agree:

1. Motions shall be filed on September 30, 2011.
2. Oppositions shall be filed on October 28, 2011.
3. Any Reply shall be filed on November 10, 2011.
4. Motions will be heard on November 29, 2011.

The parties have agreed to this briefing schedule with the understanding that Defendant is contemplating filing a motion to sever the antitrust claims as well as a motion for a bill of particulars on September 30, 2011. Should Defendant elect to file any additional motions on September 30, 2011, the parties will meet and confer to arrive at a mutually agreeable schedule for filing oppositions and reply briefs as well as a motions hearing date.

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and agreed that Defendant's outrageous government conduct motion, if any, will be filed four weeks after the Court decides the motions that are argued on September 23, 2011. Dates for a hearing on the motion and a briefing schedule will be proposed by the parties to the Court in advance of filing the motion.

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

JOHN W. KEKER

Attorney for Defendant

FREDERICK SCOTT SALYER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

MATTHEW D. SEGAL

Assistant United States Attorney

ORDER

The Court also finds the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The Court orders time excluded from the date of this order through the hearing on November 29, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(1)(D) and Local Code E.

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Salyer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Sep 12, 2011
Case No. 2:10-CR-0061-LKK (GGH) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Salyer

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FREDERICK SCOTT SALYER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Sep 12, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:10-CR-0061-LKK (GGH) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)